Comments on: New Monckton Presentation Video Includes Slides

By: Simon

Simon — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:00:00 +0000

Quick point,

At 47:55 the good lord discusses the Webster et al paper (available here btw: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.173.348&rep=rep1&type=pdf) on the trend toward increasing hurricanes across the North Pacific, Indian, Southwest Pacific Ocean and the
the North Atlantic Oceans.

Of these the smallest increase was in the North atlantic, so why is this the only increase discussed by monckton?

By: West Geo

West Geo — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:53:52 +0000

As regards the Nobel reference, Monckton found an error in the IPCC report. He insisted thay change it and they did. Al and the report authors He contrbuted to the report, therefore and deserves the Nobel as a co-author.

By: West Houston

West Houston — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:36:03 +0000

About the Nobel reference. Al Gore shared the Nobel with the authors of the IPCC report that Monckton corrected. His Lordship was therefore a contributor to the report and deserves the prize as much as any and probably more than most.

By: dave

dave — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:15:10 +0000

http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/monckton-lies-again-and-again-and-again-and-again-the-continuing-saga-of-a-practicer-of-fiction/
see how he gets it all wrong here about DDT, this gentleman cannot be trusted.

By: Paul

Paul — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:31:17 +0000

Don’t know how you folks at MN Free Market Inst were able to get both Lord Monckton and Dr Singer to come talk this last summer — both in one year is a real coup!

The only thing better would have been to add weeks of advance publicity for each.

Keep up the good work.

By: melanie

melanie — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:12:18 +0000

PLEASE MAKE THE DVD AVAILABLE SO WE CAN SPREAD THE WORD ,WHAT A GREAT INSTITUTION YOU ARE WANTING THE TRUTH IN EDUCATION AND SCIENCE .

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:04 +0000

I would appreciate a d
vd of the Lord’s talk, along with slides,

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:47 +0000

No moderation is required

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:01 +0000

Monckton is correct, thus he is ostricized by the political left!

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:32:12 +0000

Tess first: the Nobel “prize” has long been a meaningless political statement, and therefore of dubious merit, except for the monetary part. If pres. Obummer could get it for doing absolutely Nothing, then Monckton deserves it for his superb investigation of the so-called “global warming”
“facts” as presented by Gore, who would be torn to shreads during a debate between the two (which Gore avoids at all costs).
As to “global warming”, Tess is obviously ignorant of the facts, or so tied to an Agenda that she is unable or unwilling to assess the facts. The Agendists conveniently ignore the data by discarding it in favor of any data, however tenuous, that supports their “belief”.
They are well known to discard anything that doesn’t fit their curves. With them, it is a religion based on preconcieved prejudices, often related strongly to economic moires – they use it to make money, gain power, or temporary notoriety, or all three.
Note that many of the “warmers” were, just a few decades ago, “coolers”, they predicted ice buildup to inundate the earth was imminent. These same Agendists today predict the warmer earth will flood the lowlands with sea overflow,
causing mass destruction! I have, for two decades, followed the sea level personally and found there to be NO truth to their claims; sea level has risen about 3/4 inch in that time. Hardly ehough to account for the massive rise of volcanic islands around the world.
I, for one, agree with Monckton that the Warmers scare tactics are just that, and have absolutely no grounds for action of any sort. They are strictly political or, to be benevolent, so Agendisized that they would be pressed to locate their provobial proboscices in a dark room!