Comments on: New Monckton Presentation Video Includes Slides

By: Paul

Paul — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:31:17 +0000

Don’t know how you folks at MN Free Market Inst were able to get both Lord Monckton and Dr Singer to come talk this last summer — both in one year is a real coup!

The only thing better would have been to add weeks of advance publicity for each.

Keep up the good work.

By: melanie

melanie — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:12:18 +0000

PLEASE MAKE THE DVD AVAILABLE SO WE CAN SPREAD THE WORD ,WHAT A GREAT INSTITUTION YOU ARE WANTING THE TRUTH IN EDUCATION AND SCIENCE .

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:04 +0000

I would appreciate a d
vd of the Lord’s talk, along with slides,

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:47 +0000

No moderation is required

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:01 +0000

Monckton is correct, thus he is ostricized by the political left!

By: JT

JT — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:32:12 +0000

Tess first: the Nobel “prize” has long been a meaningless political statement, and therefore of dubious merit, except for the monetary part. If pres. Obummer could get it for doing absolutely Nothing, then Monckton deserves it for his superb investigation of the so-called “global warming”
“facts” as presented by Gore, who would be torn to shreads during a debate between the two (which Gore avoids at all costs).
As to “global warming”, Tess is obviously ignorant of the facts, or so tied to an Agenda that she is unable or unwilling to assess the facts. The Agendists conveniently ignore the data by discarding it in favor of any data, however tenuous, that supports their “belief”.
They are well known to discard anything that doesn’t fit their curves. With them, it is a religion based on preconcieved prejudices, often related strongly to economic moires – they use it to make money, gain power, or temporary notoriety, or all three.
Note that many of the “warmers” were, just a few decades ago, “coolers”, they predicted ice buildup to inundate the earth was imminent. These same Agendists today predict the warmer earth will flood the lowlands with sea overflow,
causing mass destruction! I have, for two decades, followed the sea level personally and found there to be NO truth to their claims; sea level has risen about 3/4 inch in that time. Hardly ehough to account for the massive rise of volcanic islands around the world.
I, for one, agree with Monckton that the Warmers scare tactics are just that, and have absolutely no grounds for action of any sort. They are strictly political or, to be benevolent, so Agendisized that they would be pressed to locate their provobial proboscices in a dark room!

By: Ian Walsh

Ian Walsh — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:32:40 +0000

Lord Monckton as an IPCC contributer, shared in the Nobel prize along with the rest of the IPCC ‘team’.

Gore was ‘handed’ the prize, but as a representative of IPCC. in other words a team effort.

Monckton is being sarcastic of Gore and the IPCC in his claim !

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:20:01 +0000

Amen to both Marty & Whip, I could not have said it better myself.

By: Whip

Whip — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:31:19 +0000

Amen Marty!!

I am sick and tired of Liberals who call everything “they” don’t agree with false and every fantasy or Marxist idea of theirs “consensus”!!

By: Marty

Marty — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:55:46 +0000

Well, Tess, let’s assume that he did indeed err in a single statement and did not fully explain his meaning (I don’t know, but for the sake of argument, let’s just say it’s an error).

Is one misstatement reason to reject all of the other data (the media loves to do that – the whole erroneous ‘credibility’ paradigm – and to also toss out such Red herrings to distract from the factual truths).

Al Gore and our present and past leaders, not to mention UN officials, are pathological liars – and have lied to us hundreds, even thousands of times… forget the source – the source is irrelevant. The question is: “Is the INFORMATION objectively true, or not?” ‘Credible’ sources can lie to you – and ‘non-credible’ sources can provide accurate information – the whole ‘credibility’ issue is a false intellectual framework – check the facts for yourself.

The truth is what it is – whether or not we believe it.

As any good investigator knows:

“Something isn’t true just because we believe it. And just because we DON’T believe something – doesn’t mean it isn’t true.”

Americans – DO YOUR OWN THINKING – and stop letting the media think for you.