<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Guest Posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnfmi.org/category/guest-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnfmi.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Political Allocation of Capital: RFK Jr and BrightSource by Bill Glahn</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/11/17/the-political-allocation-of-capital-rfk-jr-and-brightsource-by-bill-glahn/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/11/17/the-political-allocation-of-capital-rfk-jr-and-brightsource-by-bill-glahn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Glahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BrightSource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFK Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=9445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a day when Nobel-prize winner and U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu is on the hot seat on Capitol Hill, answering questions about the Solyndra scandal, details are coming out about an even larger, potential scandal. The U.K.&#8217;s Daily Mail reports about a $1.4 billion bailout for a firm tied to environmental lawyer and Presidential nephew Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.  The Mail reports, &#8220;The revelation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/11/17/the-political-allocation-of-capital-rfk-jr-and-brightsource-by-bill-glahn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Subsidies in Minnesota, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/10/25/9277/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/10/25/9277/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Glahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TenKsolar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=9277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Finance and Commerce, freelance writer Dan Haugen attempts to answer the question that I posed a couple of weeks ago.  Dan phrases the question from the point of view of two local solar manufacturers, &#8220;How will Silicon Energy and TenKsolar manage in oversupplied solar panel market?&#8221;  (Read more&#8230;.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/10/25/9277/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t I buy electricity at the farmers&#8217; market? By Bill Glahn</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/08/16/why-cant-i-buy-electricity-at-the-farmers-market-by-bill-glahn/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/08/16/why-cant-i-buy-electricity-at-the-farmers-market-by-bill-glahn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Glahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=7977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walmart is America&#8217;s largest grocer.  Yet farmers&#8217; markets seem to be more popular than ever.  Both can survive and thrive because they offer consumers distinct choices and cater to different types of customers.  At Walmart, I can save money, live better, and buy a can of “dolphin safe” tuna at a competitive price.  At my local farmers’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/08/16/why-cant-i-buy-electricity-at-the-farmers-market-by-bill-glahn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Do We Go From Here? By Tom Kelly</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/16/where-do-we-go-from-here-by-tom-kelly/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/16/where-do-we-go-from-here-by-tom-kelly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divided Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=7191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Kelly, our chairman, has published a terrific article entitled, "Where Do We Go From Here?" Our friends at the Center of the American Experiment, where Tom is a Senior Fellow, have joined with us in publishing....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/16/where-do-we-go-from-here-by-tom-kelly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Update on Energy and Environment: April 12</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/12/legislative-update-on-energy-and-environment-april-12/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/12/legislative-update-on-energy-and-environment-april-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know from media reports, budget bills have dominated action at the state legislature the past few weeks.  Action on coal, nuclear, and other policy bills has been put on hold.
 
This week, however, is shaping up as “Energy Policy Week”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/12/legislative-update-on-energy-and-environment-april-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Update on Energy and the Environment: March 18</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/17/legislative-update-on-energy-and-the-environment-march-18/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/17/legislative-update-on-energy-and-the-environment-march-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Portfolio Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India Climate Change Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s going on in Saint Paul? Here is an update from Bill Glahn, former Director of Energy Security under Gov. Pawlenty. Divided government is a challenge: while the GOP lead legislature is busy reshaping energy policy for Minnesota, Governor Dayton has named Sierra Club endorsed Senator Ellen Anderson as the new Chair of the powerful  Public Utilities Commission. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/17/legislative-update-on-energy-and-the-environment-march-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recessions and Recoveries: Lessons Not Learned by Tom Kelly</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2010/12/27/recessions-and-recoveries-lessons-not-learned-by-tom-kelly/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2010/12/27/recessions-and-recoveries-lessons-not-learned-by-tom-kelly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Kelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=5849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Kelly is the chairman of the Minnesota Free Market Institute. He is also a fellow at the Center of the American Experiment (CAE) and a partner in the Finance and Restructuring Department at Dorsey &#038; Whitney. He wrote the following piece for CAE and we republish it with CAE's gracious permission. You can read Mitch Pearlstein's wonderful forward]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2010/12/27/recessions-and-recoveries-lessons-not-learned-by-tom-kelly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dayton Claims He will Tax the Rich. Economist John Spry Says Dayton Would Also Tax the Poor.</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2010/10/29/dayton-claims-he-will-tax-the-rich-economist-john-spry-says-dayton-would-also-tax-the-poor/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2010/10/29/dayton-claims-he-will-tax-the-rich-economist-john-spry-says-dayton-would-also-tax-the-poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=5316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is economist John Spry&#8217;s take on Mark Dayton&#8217;s proposal for a surtax on consumers loans: &#8220;Tax the poor some more.&#8221; That is exactly what one of Mark Dayton&#8217;s tax hike proposals will do. He proposes a 30 percent surtax on consumer loans that carry an interest rate in excess of 15 percent annually. Minnesota [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2010/10/29/dayton-claims-he-will-tax-the-rich-economist-john-spry-says-dayton-would-also-tax-the-poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: &#8220;Panic&#8221; by Andrew Redleaf and Richard Vigilante</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2010/05/14/book-review-panic-by-andrew-redleaf-and-richard-vigilante/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2010/05/14/book-review-panic-by-andrew-redleaf-and-richard-vigilante/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 01:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=4370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://mnfmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Panic-By-Andrew-Redleaf-and-Richard-Vigilante.bmp" align="left" style="padding: 7px" width="115" height="185" /> 
<align="center"><b>Finance is not Physics.</b></align>
<align="center">A Review of <i>Panic</i>, by Andrew Redleaf and Richard Vigilante</align>
<br />
Friedrich Hayek’s 1974 Nobel Prize lecture, “The Pretense of Knowledge,” concerns the “failure of [Keynesian] economists to guide policy more successfully.” Hayek believed that failure was “closely connected with their propensity to imitate as closely as possible the procedures of the … physical sciences.”  Hayek’s point, to simplify, is that the desire to create mathematical models of economic behavior inevitably leads to the exclusion of critical factors that cannot be easily quantified.  The result is an elegant, but not accurate, model. Speaking of the Keynesian policies of the 1960s and 1970s, Hayek hypothesized that “an almost exclusive concentration on quantitatively measureable surface phenomena has produced a policy which has made matters worse.”]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2010/05/14/book-review-panic-by-andrew-redleaf-and-richard-vigilante/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care: A Titanic Misrepresentation</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2009/09/10/health-care-a-titanic-misrepresentation/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2009/09/10/health-care-a-titanic-misrepresentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Ammon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=3414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3416" title="mEDICAL bANKRUPTCY" src="http://mnfreemarketinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/mEDICAL-bANKRUPTCY.JPG" alt="mEDICAL bANKRUPTCY" width="446" height="282" />As I’ve been listening to various talk radio programs I’ve heard the following new talking point proffered by national health care supporters at least four times in the past 48 hours: We have to pass a government option!  Two-thirds of the bankruptcies in the US are caused by medical bills!

The basis for this argument is found in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/american_journal_of_medicine_09.pdf">this recent study</a> in the American Journal of Medicine.  A snippet of the conclusion of the study is as follows: Using a conservative definition, 62.1 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92 percent of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5000, or 10 percent of pretax family income.

At first look you’d have to say “Wow!”  Can nearly two-thirds of bankruptcies be caused by the results of medical costs?  The answer, after you look at the study and some other information is “No.”

<em>A Guest Post by Randy Ammon</em>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2009/09/10/health-care-a-titanic-misrepresentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

