<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; ObamaCare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnfmi.org/tag/obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnfmi.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should Minnesota drop out of Medicaid?</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/09/26/should-minnesota-drop-out-of-medicaid/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/09/26/should-minnesota-drop-out-of-medicaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John LaPlante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John LaPlante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=5671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the possible consequences of ObamaCare is that states might come out ahead financially  by dropping out of Medicaid&#8211;and without reducing the number of people receiving taxpayer assistance. First, here&#8217;s a quick review of Medicaid. No state has to have a Medicaid program, but all of them do. That&#8217;s because if they do, they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/09/26/should-minnesota-drop-out-of-medicaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical device tax hurts both patients and providers&#8211;and has big impact in Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/07/23/medical-device-tax-hurts-both-patients-and-providers-and-has-big-impact-in-minnesota/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/07/23/medical-device-tax-hurts-both-patients-and-providers-and-has-big-impact-in-minnesota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=7789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ObamaCare created an arbitrary 2.3% excise tax on medical device manufacturers that could have a devastating impact on the jobs of over 26,000 people in our state who work for medical device companies. The healthcare legislation will fall heavily on smaller, start-up companies as well large innovative businesses that are essential to revitalizing our economy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/07/23/medical-device-tax-hurts-both-patients-and-providers-and-has-big-impact-in-minnesota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ObamaCare Disrupts Employer-based Insurance, Spikes Federal Deficits</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/09/obamacare-disrupts-employer-based-insurance-spikes-federal-deficits/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/09/obamacare-disrupts-employer-based-insurance-spikes-federal-deficits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John LaPlante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=7129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More evidence this week that ObamaCare means the end of health insurance as we know it: &#8220;A report by McKinsey &#38; Co. has found that 30% of employers are likely to stop offering workers health insurance after the bulk of the Obama administration&#8217;s health overhaul takes effect in 2014.&#8221; That&#8217;s the lead in a Wall [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/06/09/obamacare-disrupts-employer-based-insurance-spikes-federal-deficits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Insurance Exchanges: What is the GOP to do?</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/05/18/health-care-insurance-exchanges-what-is-the-gop-to-do/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/05/18/health-care-insurance-exchanges-what-is-the-gop-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Exchanges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an excellent summary by Kaiser Health News  of the dilemma that GOP lawmakers face with regard to health care exchanges. The exchanges are required by ObamaCare. If Obamacare is not defeated either by the U.S. Supreme Court or by repeal by Congress, the state of Minnesota has to have an exchange in place on Jan. 1, 2014. Rep. Steve Gottwalt, who opposes ObamaCare, think the state is better off crafting the exchange sooner rather than late]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/05/18/health-care-insurance-exchanges-what-is-the-gop-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Consider ObamaCare Appeal</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/15/supreme-court-to-consider-obamacare-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/15/supreme-court-to-consider-obamacare-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John LaPlante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John LaPlante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is a big day in the legal challenge to ObamaCare: The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to hear, on an expedited basis, the challenge brought to the law by Ken Cuccinelli, the attorney general of Virginia. David Catron has more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/04/15/supreme-court-to-consider-obamacare-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2: Obamacare and Judge Vinson</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/06/round-2-obamacare-and-judge-vinson/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/06/round-2-obamacare-and-judge-vinson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 02:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Crockett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update) The Florida case (involving 26 states) against Obamacare has a new development as of March 4th . 

The Wall Street Journal had the best summary I've seen so far. Vinson stayed his ruling/injunction while the case is appealed
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/06/round-2-obamacare-and-judge-vinson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House File 468: Prohibition of State Funds to Implement Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/04/house-file-468-prohibition-of-state-funds-to-implement-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/04/house-file-468-prohibition-of-state-funds-to-implement-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Crockett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=6471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen (R-25A Glencoe) will introduce House File 468  next Tuesday, March 8th. The bill prohibits the use of state funds to implement Obamacare. Kim Crockett is scheduled to testify about constitutional issues faced by state legislators ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2011/03/04/house-file-468-prohibition-of-state-funds-to-implement-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reconciliation as a Tool to Adopt Health Care Legislation: Two Points of View</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/18/reconciliation-as-a-tool-to-adopt-health-care-legislation-two-points-of-view/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/18/reconciliation-as-a-tool-to-adopt-health-care-legislation-two-points-of-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Crockett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=4113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy offers two very different points of view on the reconciliation issue. This is worth your time if you are trying to sort out this complicated issue. Here is the link to their  web page and the articles  <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1792/pub_detail.asp">http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1792/pub_detail.asp</a> We have reprinted with the Federalist Society's permission the introduction below.

Reconciliation and Congress
<p style="MARGIN-TOP: 1px">New Federal Initiatives Project</p>

March 10, 2010

<em><strong>Brought to you by the </strong></em><a title="Federalism &#38; Separation of Powers Practice Group" href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/id.6/pgdetail.asp"><span style="color: #3e55ac;"><em><strong>Federalism &#38; Separation of Powers Practice Group</strong></em></span></a>

There is a lot of discussion right now about the use of "reconciliation," a mechanism for enacting legislation to carry out the budget resolution that cannot be filibustered in the Senate, to enable enactment of health care legislation.  As part of our New Federal Initiatives Project, we asked Martin Gold, a partner at Covington &#38; Burling and one of the country's leading experts on congressional procedures, for a paper discussing the issues that this raises.  The views set out in this paper are his own, not those of the Federalist Society.  For a competing take on these issues, see “Reconciliation for Health Care Should Not Be an Issue” by Stanley Collener, a contributing writer for Roll Call who for most of his career worked on budgetary issues.

<strong>Related Links</strong>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span><a href="http://mnfmi.org/publications/pubid.1791/pub_detail.asp">--"Reconciliation and Health Care" by Martin Gold, March 10, 2010</a></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://mnfmi.org/images/spacer.gif" border="0" alt="" height="10" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span><a href="http://www.capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/stan-collender/865/reconciliation-health-care-should-not-be-issue" target="_blank">--“Reconciliation for Health Care Should Not Be an Issue” By Stan Collender, April 21, 2009, Capital Gains and Games</a></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://mnfmi.org/images/spacer.gif" border="0" alt="" height="10" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubid.1792/pub_detail.asp"></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/18/reconciliation-as-a-tool-to-adopt-health-care-legislation-two-points-of-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Kill the Bill&#8221; Rally at State Capitol</title>
		<link>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/16/kill-the-bill-rally-at-state-capitol/</link>
		<comments>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/16/kill-the-bill-rally-at-state-capitol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Crockett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Crockett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnfmi.org/?p=4107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We attended the "Kill the Bill" rally in St. Paul sponsored by the Minnesota Majority. Estimates on turn out range from 2,000 (state police) to 4,000. As always, it was a cold but not too rainy day for citizens to petition their government. Here are some photos from the event.

<img class="size-medium wp-image-4106" title="Kill the Bill Rally WWII Vets" src="http://mnfmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Kill-the-Bill-Rally-WWII-Vets-300x227.jpg" alt="World War II Vets Reject Socialized Medicine" width="300" height="227" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mnfmi.org/2010/03/16/kill-the-bill-rally-at-state-capitol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

