Hello

Archives for ObamaCare

Update on Obamacare: DOJ Files Motion for Expedited Appeal in Florida Case Before March 10 Deadline

Update: the federal government updated its notice of appeal yesterday by filing a Motion for Expedition as required by Judge Vinson’s oder and stay. It had until today to do so. It is interesting to note that the DOJ refers to Obamacare as “comprehensive reform of our national health care system….” Until last March when this federal assualt was passed, we did not have a “national health care system.” Now we do.

Here is the DOJ’s proposed briefing schedule (subject to change):Defendants’ Opening Brief: due 4/18/2011;Plaintiffs’ Response Brief: due 5/18/2011; and Defendants’ Reply Brief: due 6/1/2011 (as qualified on page 6)

From earlier this week: Here is a summary of the Notice of Appeal from the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog:

“The Justice Department on Tuesday appealed judge Roger Vinson’s January ruling that declared the new health-care law unconstitutional. The case will now move to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. Click here for the notice of appeal. (Briefing on the merits of the case will come later.) Click here for all LB coverage of the health-care challenges.

Vinson voided the law in January but stayed his ruling last week, conditioned upon the Obama administration’s appealing it within seven days. He also required the government to seek expedited appellate review.

Two other federal appeals courts, in Richmond, Va., and Cincinnati, are preparing to consider the constitutionality of the law late this spring. To date, three lower courts have found the law constitutional, while two have ruled the other way.”

Round 2: Obamacare and Judge Vinson

(Update) The Florida case (involving 26 states) against Obamacare has a new development.

The Wall Street Journal had the best summary I’ve seen so far. Vinson stayed his ruling/injunction while the case is appealed, but he put it on a fast track, noting that this case should be resolved by the Supreme Court as soon as possible. Judge Vinson’s order is only 20 pages long; he best summarizes his original ruling and why it was an unambiguous injunction-and yet why it makes sense to stay his injunction at this point. He also tells us what is going on in the various plaintiff states while the legal issues are resolved (implementation which poses a danger, see below). It is worth reading—he takes the DOJ lawyers (and the Obama administration) to the woodshed.

Michael F. Cannon from CATO has pointed out that one of the reasons Judge Vinson declined to block implementation outright is that some of the plaintiff states are moving forward with implementation of Obamacare while the case is on appeal. The administration pointed out in its motion that most of the plaintiff states have applied for grants or federal resources. States are playing it safe, in case they do not win in the Supreme Court. Cannon points out that state implementation is undermining the legal case against the unconstitutional law.

Minnesota, which is not a plaintiff in any of the law suits, must look to its legislators for leadership on this issue. The issue of insurance exchanges (HF 497) and expending funds to implement Obamacare (HF 468) are expected to be heard in the House this week. I am scheduled to testify in the House Health and Human Services Reform Committee on Tuesday in Room 200 (hearings start at 2:30pm but there is no way to know what time HF 468 will be heard).

We are not in well chartered territory. The Pelosi/Reid Congress and President Obama joined forces last year to aggressively assert federal power over the states and the people in a policy area previously thought of as under state (10th Amendment) and individual (9th Amendment) control. Minnesotans chose divided government last fall, so as I said above, we must look to our legislators for leadership while the legal process proceeds. Let’s see what the legislature does this week and calendar March 10th to see how the administration responds to Judge Vinson.

House File 468: Prohibition of State Funds to Implement Obamacare

We the People

Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen (R-25A Glencoe) will introduce House File 468 next Tuesday, March 8th. The bill prohibits the use of state funds to implement Obamacare. Kim Crockett is scheduled to testify about constitutional issues faced by state legislators and governors in the face of the federal health care mandate. The Health and Human Services Reform Committee meets in Room 200 at 2:30 PM.

The language of the bill is straighforward. We’ll have more on this later.

PROHIBITION OF STATE FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN FEDERAL HEALTH CARE REFORMS. State funds must not be expended in the planning or implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability and Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152, and no provisions of the act may be implemented, until the constitutionality of the act has been affirmed by the United States Supreme Court.
EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Page 2 of 5:« 1 2 3 4 5 »