Hello

Archives for Taxes & Regulations

Working until April 17 to pay for government

In 2012, Americans will work 8 hours a day, five days a week, from the beginning of the year until April 17 to pay for the spending incurred in their name by federal, state, and local governments. That’s one of the findings of the Tax Foundation’s latest calculation of “Tax Freedom Day.”

Tax Freedom Day (trademarked by the foundation) is one way to express the cost of government. According to this year’s version of the report, Americans spend 107 days out of 365 days in the year working for governments, to pay $6.2 trillion in taxes. The single largest category is the individual income tax (40 days worth of work), followed by payroll taxes (23 days), sales and excise taxes (15 days), property taxes (12 days), corporate income taxes (10 days), and miscellaneous taxes (7 days).

If you account for deficit spending, Tax Freedom Day comes on May 14. That is within one week of the record date of May 21, 1945-a time in World War II just after the U.S. had finished defeating Nazi Germany and was closing in on the Japanese homeland.

The report also calculates Tax Freedom Day on a state-by-state basis. As you might expect, it comes earlier in some states than in others. It comes the earliest in Tennessee (March 30) and the latest in Connecticut (May 5). Tennessee has no state income tax. Connecticut has a state income tax. More importantly, its residents have higher incomes than those of any other state, which means they get more heavily taxed by the so-called progressive structure of the federal income tax. In Minnesota, the day comes on April 22, later than all but seven other states.

Spending on goods and services is a necessary fact of life. We spend money on food, clothing, and housing, for example, though less on those combined than on taxes. Some spending on government is necessary. But the question is, “Are we getting our money’s worth?” Governments get their money by taking money away from the non-governmental sector in ways that are obvious (hello, April 15!) and not so obvious (the opportunity costs of the taxes paid, interest on debt, inflation induced by monetizing the federal debt, etc.).

Like debt, government spending can be good or bad, wise or foolish. Incurring debt to buy something that will help you permanently increase your income by 30 percent is wise; incurring debt to buy a cache of drain cleaner, which you then pour on your breakfast cereal every day, is not.

So the concept of Tax Freedom Day doesn’t in itself tell us whether we spend too much or too little on government. To make that judgment, we need to look elsewhere. (What does it do to our incomes? Civil society?) But the fact that we spend 30 percent of the year working to pay for government should drive everyone to ask some hard questions of our public officials, and ourselves.

A Surplus Now, but the Deficit’s On the Way

Minnesota Management and Budget has forecast a tiny surplus in the state budget for the current biennium. Great. But as Commissioner Jim Schowalter observes, “we still have lots of IOU’s” to pay back-including the “school shift” of $2.7 billion.

The press release also shows another cloud on the horizon: “The forecast shows a projected deficit of $1.1 billion for fiscal years 2014-15.”

Uh-oh.

The state’s spending trajectory is still unsustainable.

Shifting Towards a Sales Tax

While government needs taxes to run, not all taxes are equal in their effect. A new report from the Tax Foundation-State and Local Sales Taxes in 2012-evaluates the burden of state and local sales taxes across the United States. It shows great variation. State sales tax rates range from 0 percent (Alaska, Delaware, New Hampshire, Oregon), to 7.25 percent (California). Some states have local sales taxes, while others do not. And of course states define the “base” differently: Some tax food and clothing while others don’t.

If you look only at state-level taxes, Minnesota has the seventh-highest burden in the land, behind California, Indiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Tennessee.

Local sales taxes in Minnesota are widespread or high as they are in some other states. So when you add in the burden of local sales taxes and rank the states, Minnesota drops from its position as the seventh-highest-taxed state (in sales taxes). But in the “new” position of 17, it’s still more heavily taxed than other states. When you consider all taxes, Minnesota is the seventh-most heavily taxed state.

Relying on the income tax, whether personal or corporate, presents a lot of challenge for state lawmakers as well anyone who depends on the state budget. For one thing, income taxes, especially progressive ones, are prone to boom-or-bust revenue cycles. (Minnesota has the 44th-heaviest burden of personal income taxes, so it’s quite a relevant point.) This means that the state has to scramble whenever hard times come, and that lawmakers are tempted to build unsustainable growth into the budget when times are good. Aside from cutting back from spending (a good thing in itself), the way to budget stability is to change the mix of taxes that government depends on. To quote from Russell S. Sobel (West Virginia University) and Gary A. Wagner (University of Arkansas), “the retail sales tax, when it includes food, is quite a bit more stable than is the individual income tax, and that when it excludes food it is about as variable as the income tax.”

Given all this, I wouldn’t mind seeing a higher sales tax rate if it meant lower rates in income taxes.

Page 1 of 45:1 2 3 4 »Last »